Editorial standards

Sources and evidence

• Prefer primary research, systematic reviews, and official public-health or regulatory guidance.
• Link important health and nutrition claims to the source a reader can inspect.
• Describe uncertainty, study population, and practical limits when they materially change the conclusion.
• Do not turn an association, a small experiment, or a broad benchmark into a stronger causal claim.

Product claims

Claims about FuelForm are checked against implemented app behavior, configuration, or stored evaluation evidence. Planned behavior is labeled as such. A build, internal test, or simulator check is not described as an App Store release.

Health boundaries and credentials

Articles provide general information and do not diagnose, prescribe, or replace individual care. A clinical or dietetic credential is never implied by a team byline. If qualified professional input is added to a page in the future, that person's name, relevant credential, role, and contribution must be stated on that page.

Authorship and tools

The FuelForm Editorial Team is an organizational byline, not a fictional person. Automated and AI tools may help with drafting, checking, or formatting, but they are not treated as an authority. Published claims remain the editorial team's responsibility.

Dates and corrections

Pages show a publication date and show a modified date only when the underlying content changes. Corrections that materially alter meaning are made in the article and reflected in its date. We do not change dates merely to create a freshness signal.